Talk:Olive baboon/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs) 19:05, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to take on this review and I will study the article in detail shortly. My initial impression is good, but I can see at once that the lead section is too short for an article of this size. The lead should provide a summary of the information in the body of the text, mentioning the main points from each of the different sections. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:05, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Using Earwig's copyvio detection tool there are worrying results, five of which give cause for concern. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am putting this review on hold for one week. If during that time action is taken on the issues raised above, I will review the article in detail. If not, I will fail this nomination. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria

Little action has been taken on the matters mentioned above by the nominator. However, fortunately another editor has corrected some of the prose which was too close to the source, and I find that the other copyvios suspected by "Earwig", were false positives where the Wikipedia article was copied by outside entities. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:21, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article is well written and complies with MOS guidelines on prose and grammar, structure and layout.
The article uses many reliable third-party sources, and makes frequent citations to them. I do not believe it contains original research.
The article covers the main aspects of the subject and remains focussed.
The article is neutral.
The article is stable.
The images are relevant and have suitable captions, and are either in the public domain or properly licensed.

Final assessment - I believe this article reaches the GA criteria. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:21, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]