Talk:Olfactory fatigue

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Neurology task force.

Merge

Merely a suggestion, this article is a little short to exist by itself unless the author is planning to expand it, perhaps it could be made into a subsection of the Anosmia article?SGGH 11:43, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well ... it might work, but it is a somewhat different topic. Anosmia appears to be (I'm not an MD) the permanent loss of smell where this article is on the normal, temporary loss of sensitivity to a very specific odor. 129.237.114.171 21:22, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. These are two different topics and should stay separated.

Reference is about odor and physical fatigue not olfactory fatigue

Saito N, Yamano E, Ishii A, Tanaka M, Nakamura J, Watanabe Y (2018-03-29). Roman G (ed.). "Involvement of the olfactory system in the induction of anti-fatigue effects by odorants". PLOS One. 13(3): e0195263. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195263. PMC 5875884. PMID 29596487.

If one reviews this reference, it discusses physical fatigue and not olfactory fatigue. The sections referring to it should be closely reviewed to determine their validity.

JSR (talk) 14:03, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Coffee "pro" claims unsubstantiated

The following source is listed in the section on coffee

Secundo L, Sobel N (June 2006). "The influence of smelling coffee on olfactory habituation". Chemical Senses. 31 (5): A52.

This source is given as the "pro" side in a characterization of the coffee smell debate as having evidence for and against. As shown here, the Chemical Senses journal issue 5 of volume 31 contains no such article. A search of Crossref did not show any evidence of an article carrying that name. Thus, this section's characterization is unsubstantiated.

Until other evidence is brought forth showing a "pro" side, I have rephrased the section to only mention the one confirmed source. I have also renamed the section to "Mitigating scent's effects on olfactory fatigue", as the sole remaining source mentions only the mitigating effects of coffee, air and lemon slices - in particular, that coffee worked no better than the lemon or the air. Spintendo 04:18, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]