Talk:Old West Academy

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Utah portal This article is supported by WikiProject Utah (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is POV

It needs to be Cleaned up to be NPOV. I suggest changing the word 'detainees' to 'enrollees' or something along those lines. Deathoftherescue 18:01, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I dont think so

If you by enroll mean that they sign up for it, I dont think that enrollees covers it.

Parents sign their child up. Either they trick the child to go there or they pay someone to bring the child there.

Once they have arrived they can not leave free of will and they are not convicted in a court of law. I just dont think that enrollee covers it.

Covergaard 18:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

calm down there. It was a suggestion, not a definite "this has to be enrollees." Deathoftherescue 19:28, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For right now, this and many like it have been deleted or stubbed at the request of WP:OTRS. Let's leave it at that until this mess can get sorted out. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me Please review me!} 19:30, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WWASP connection

They are a part in a lawsuit against wwasp related facilities. See http://www.wturley.com/Recent_Filings/20061218%20Wood%20-%20Complaint%202nd%20Amended%2088.pdf

Covergaard 21:23, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is a brief filed by plaintiffs who are suing WWASPS and several of its schools. The brief states that the defendant institutions are connected, but statements of that nature, made in a legal brief, do not constitute proof.--orlady 21:39, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]