Talk:Old Time Relijun

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Old Time Relijun

The0208 and I have collaborated to create this article about Old Time Relijun. I believe that we have provided enough evidence to defend its right to exist.Jurjen 03:00, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the speedy deletion tag. I looked them up on Google and found 151 thousand hits. Most of the ones on the first page were related to this band, including some Amazon pages where you can buy their CDs. It looks like they meet WP:MUSIC to me. --Idont Havaname (Talk) 03:04, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If nothing else, these guys represent the WP:MUSIC guideline "Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style". They deserve to be here. Maybe I'll check the liner notes for relevant information to include. Also, why are the releases separated by year rather than by release? this isn't the standard for wp band articles, is it?

Image

I propose that the image be changed to photo 1 or photo 2 (or one like those)in order to better represent the band. The current image is, in my opinion, far to normal. Any feedback on this would be appreciated, for I don't want to change it without any support. Jurjen 23:05, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer Photo 1. The0208 07:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:OldTimeRelijun.jpg

Image:OldTimeRelijun.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]