Talk:Old Straight Road/GA1

GA Review

Passed. BigChrisKenney (talk) 00:08, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 08:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: BigChrisKenney (talk · contribs) 05:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, again @Chiswick Chap: I saw this article in November of 2024, but wasn't confident enough to review it at that time. I'll take a stab at it this go around. BigChrisKenney (talk) 05:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Initial Review

Intro

"He destroys Númenor and its army, in the process reshaping Arda into a sphere, and separating it and its continent of Middle-earth from Valinor so that men can no longer reach it."

Could it be rewritten like this: In the process of destroying Númenor and its army, he reshapes Arda into a sphere, separating it and its continent of Middle-earth from Valinor so that men can no longer reach it.

I made an edit you may wish to review.

OK.

Narratives

The Silmarillion

I added a link and made some edits you may wish to reveiw.

OK.

"The Fall of Numenor'

I made some edits you may wish to review. (putting the paragraph onto past tense)

OK. This assumes all the events are 'past', a tale looked back on rather than the Third Age events which are told in the present.

Two unfinished time travel novels

Good!

The Lord of the Rings

Good!

Analysis

Cosmology

Good!

Major theme

Good!

Scyld Scefing

I made some edits you may wish to review.

OK.

Bifrost

Good!

Legacy

Removed an extra space.

Sources

All pertinent.

Images

All pertinent.

This one was a bit of a quick one. Not much needed to be written about. Another great article. I'll check on it after you have had time to reivew my comments.

Got to remember to sign! BigChrisKenney (talk) 06:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BigChrisKenney: Many thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Final Assessment

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):

b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (references):

b (citations to reliable sources):

c (OR):

d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):

b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall: Pass/Fail:

Congrats again! +1 GA! BigChrisKenney (talk) 00:03, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.