Talk:Old Polish

Languages Mid‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poland Mid‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kochanowski

I'm not entirely sure Kochanowski is the best example of Old Polish. As far as I know it's Middle Polish, isn't it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.49.53.10 (talk • contribs) 08:23, June 28, 2009

Agreed, I'll move it to the new Middle Polish language article. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 15:43, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Long sentence -- can the author edit?

This is a beautiful sentence but alas it is not comprehensible: "That said, the relatively slight differences between Old and Modern Polish are unremarkable considering that the chronological stages of other European languages that Old Polish is contemporary with are generally not very different from the Modern stages and many of them already labelled "Early Modern." FromTheVillage (talk) 03:05, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Old polish nasal vowel is now in Unicode

The section talking about the old nasal vowel uses ø to represent the nasal vowels, which was something of typographical workaround. Since Unicode 14 (2021) we have the proper characters encoded: Ꟁ (U+A7C0) and ꟁ (U+A7C1). Any objection to updating all instances of ø to ꟁ? 204.225.215.56 (talk) 17:56, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say go for it. Vininn126 (talk) 20:24, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]