Talk:Old Head of Kinsale

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Irish Maritime

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Irish Maritime, a collaborative effort to improve and standardise the content and structure of maritime, seafaring and inland waterways articles associated with the island of Ireland. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Irish MaritimeWikipedia:WikiProject Irish MaritimeTemplate:WikiProject Irish MaritimeIrish Maritime articles

Lighthouses Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lighthouses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lighthouses and other water navigational aids on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LighthousesWikipedia:WikiProject LighthousesTemplate:WikiProject LighthousesLighthouses articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Convert

@Xx78900: I'm just passing through and am happy for you or anyone else maintaining this article to decide whether to show metric or imperial first. However, I have strong opinions about {{conv}}. There are two useful convert templates:

{{convert}} is standard (1.1 million transclusions).
{{cvt}} is the same but sets abbr=on (97,800 transclusions).

For example:

{{convert|18|km|miles}} → 18 kilometres (11 miles)
{{cvt|18|km|miles}} → 18 km (11 miles)
{{conv|18|km|miles}} → 18 kilometres (11 miles) (same as convert)

Using {{conv}} is not useful because it is the same as {{convert}} but offers a trivial saving in typing. The problem with {{conv}} is that it causes confusion since it makes people wonder what it is and whether there is a difference from {{convert}} and which "should" be used. Please decide which of {{cvt}} and {{convert}} is wanted and use that. Johnuniq (talk) 02:20, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I prefer the shorthand {{conv}} to {{convert}}, and am probably going to keep using it in future. I will however now change all of the {{conv}} templates on this page to {{convert}} :) Xx78900 (talk) 10:53, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. You might consider whether using a very rarely used abbreviation is worthwhile. The main problem is the confusion due to people not knowing what conv is (whereas convert is self-explanatory), along with the problem that cvt, while mysterious, does something useful and sometimes editors use conv when they mean cvt. Johnuniq (talk) 23:38, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]