Talk:Old Brodleians
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rewrite
[edit]will rewrite in own words
the content on pitchero was written by the club anyway
- Which doesn't nessecarily make it uncopyrighted content. NoisyJinx (talk) 13:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- OK then I will rewrite from scratch and only add photos owned by me have another look so far
nb I am the club secretary of Old Brodleians
cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnkett (talk • contribs) 13:53, 6 February 2010 (UTC) from our pitchero website 10. CONTENT SUBMITTED Pitchero does not claim ownership of the Content you place on your Pitchero web site. By submitting Content to Pitchero for inclusion on your Pitchero web site, you grant Pitchero a world-wide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, modify, adapt and publish the Content solely for the purpose of displaying, distributing and promoting your web site on Pitchero's Internet properties. This license exists only for as long as you continue to be a Pitchero customer and shall be terminated at the time your Web site is terminated.
You acknowledge that Pitchero does not pre-screen Content, but that Pitchero and its designees shall have the right (but not the obligation) in their sole discretion to refuse or remove any Content that is available via the Service. Without limiting the foregoing, Pitchero and its designees shall have the right to remove any Content that violates the TOS or is otherwise objectionable. You agree that you must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with, the use of any Content, including any reliance on the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of such Content. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnkett (talk • contribs) 13:56, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
have changed link to http://www.oldbrodleians.co.uk/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnkett (talk • contribs) 14:06, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Nothing in the quoted section of the web site hints at making it free content by submitting it there. But as you said you are the club's secretary, and that the text you used is by the club, it would probably give you permission to use it and release it on Wikipedia. Probably. On the other hand this might constitute a conflict of interest. Which isn't worse than using copyrighted material, but still not very welcome as it can corrupt neutrality.
Btw: Can you please sign your comments on talk pages? Adding ~~~~ adds your signature, and eases life for the bot a little. Thanks :) NoisyJinx (talk) 14:17, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
er lost me now Pitchero are saying its up to us to control the content so we do so where is the conflict ~~~~
and I've re written it all now anyway ~~~~
Certainly looks a tad better now. What about achievements or competitive records? Actually noone knowing what RUFC means will actually know what exactly the club is, what they do... NoisyJinx (talk) 18:25, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Wikified it a bit, so you get the basic outline of how it should look. Didn't dive in too much, so all athletic matters are yet to be covered, as is the history, the squad and whatever is worth noting. Enjoy. NoisyJinx (talk) 20:00, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
cheers get the drift will add to it ~~~~
- Hint: Just doing the four tildes without the nowiki tags will make it work :) noisy jinx huh? 23:43, 6 February 2010 (UTC)