Talk:Oklahoma Territory's at-large congressional district

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Oklahoma Low‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) place(s).

Proposed merger into Oklahoma Territory

The information in this page should be merged into the Oklahoma Territory article, where its minimal content would support the discussion of the territorial government. I plan to proceed with the merger unless there is sufficient discussion against this move. Discussion will close June 28, 2013. Bruin2 (talk) 14:19, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined to oppose merely on the basis of parallelism with all the similar articles in Category:At-large United States congressional districts. While other stuff is not always a good guide, the rationale given here would also apply to many of those other articles and as such, the discussion should probably consider the group in general. older ≠ wiser 14:47, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I find both arguments strong, but I think it needs to be merged for the time being and separated back out if there is sufficient content provided to make a stand-alone article. Okheric (talk) 18:51, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Opposed I agree with Bkonrad- We would have to this with the other states.-thank you-RFD (talk) 23:20, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merger implementation This issue has remained open far longer than originally intended, without generating much additional input. While a few users oppose the merger because other states have already adopted another system, I am not convinced that the prior format best presents the information for Oklahoma Territory. Therefore, I will proceed to integrate the content from this article into the more general Oklahoma Territorial article. Bruin2 (talk) 19:15, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Text transfer completed

Text from the main page into Oklahoma Territory has been completed. Bruin2 (talk) 06:15, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oklahoma Territory's at-large congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090416084151/http://digital.library.okstate.edu:80/encyclopedia/ to http://digital.library.okstate.edu/encyclopedia

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:51, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]