Talk:Oklahoma City Streetcar

Oklahoma Mid‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Streetcars Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

made a correction of the OKC Streetcar line length vs. track length. Per OKC.gov (https://www.okc.gov/government/maps-3/projects/modern-streetcar-transit), the system will be 6.9 miles long via two lines (line length) using 4.6 miles of rail (track length).

Desperately needs "Criticism" section

The OKC streetcar system is routinely mocked for low ridership, and costs far exceeding any forseeable recovery by the current fares. Considering adding a section to discuss these criticisms. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.229.223.100 (talk) 14:08, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Write it in then Subscribe to me (talk) 01:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

740 V?

How? No explanation is given. It might be a typo. Is there any concrete evidence to prove it's 740? Subscribe to me (talk) 20:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]