Talk:Okama Report

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

A fact from Okama Report appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 October 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that reprinted editions of the 1989 manga series Okama Report contain a postscript from an LGBT-rights group noting that the series contains exaggerated and inaccurate depictions of LGBT people?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Okama Report.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 13:28, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that a Japanese LGBT rights group protested the 1989 manga series Okama Report for what it argued were its stereotypical and inaccurate depictions of LGBT people? Source: 1 2
- ALT1:... that reprinted editions of the 1989 manga series Okama Report contain a postscript from an LGBT rights group noting that the series contains exaggerated and inaccurate depictions of LGBT people? Source: 1 2

Reviewed: Migration (Bonobo album)

Created by Morgan695 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:12, 11 September 2020 (UTC).[reply]

It's defo not long enuf once you cut out the uncited synopsis plus the parts that only refer to primary sources. Apart from the OCCUR controversy, I'm not sure if it actually meets notability guidelines, so it looks like more work needs to be done to demonstrate the subject's notability. Kingoflettuce (talk) 09:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kingoflettuce: The article contains 1550 B of readable prose with the Synopsis section removed, meeting the length requirements for DYK. Morgan695 (talk) 16:50, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kingoflettuce I have never came across a rule in which an uncited synopsis can't count toward the length. As for notability, do you want to nominate this for AfD to move this nomination along either way? SL93 (talk) 01:13, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

POerhaps somebody more qualified would like to chime in. It just doesn't pass my smell test. Sorry I must have missed this. Kingoflettuce (talk) 14:29, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New reviewer needed. Morgan695 (talk) 15:51, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing: - Douban, a social-networking service, falls under WP:UGC and should not be used to verify content.
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Prose length is not an issue, regardless of whether the Synopsis section is included or not. Sourcing is an issue. feminist (talk) wear a mask, you stupid bastards 03:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Feminist: Replaced with source deemed reliable in previous discussions here and here. Morgan695 (talk) 05:06, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. AGF for all Japanese-language sources. feminist (talk) wear a mask, you stupid bastards 05:22, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]