Talk:Oilgear

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Early Years, Powering with Fluid Power First Paragraph

This paragraph does not seem very objective, and I believe it should be changed. There are also no sources. Wikipedia:Neutral point of view The Hamsternaut (talk) 13:35, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of Encyclopedic Tone within the Page

The entire page may need to be rewritten, mostly due to it sounding more like a narrative than an encyclopedia. The topics within the page could be added to separate bigger topics, and a lack of sources as well. Zalewo (talk) 15:29, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, reading through the article it really seems like a lot of peacock words are used and as you said, doesn't seem like an encyclopedia. A complete overhaul would be good. Ame ★ (talk) 16:39, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]