Talk:Ohio State Route 167/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Newyorkadam (talk · contribs) 19:07, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
I'll take this. I'll start it tomorrow.
Quick-glance comments:
- SR 538, which is wikilinked in this article, just redirects back to Ohio State Route 167 (the article nominated for GA)
- I know a photo of the route isn't required, but it certainly can't hurt. Can you please try to find one?
- No disambiguation links in this article
- Other than that it looks good :) I'll start this either later today or tomorrow!
-Newyorkadam (talk) 21:19, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Newyorkadam
- Done.—– 23:41, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Comments:
- Please wikilink 'US 6', 'at-grade intersection'
- Done.—– 21:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- Please add a reference after this line, because it's statistical data: 'The highest traffic count is in Jefferson, where 2,260 vehicles travel on the road on average.'
- Eh, added.—– 21:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- Please try to find some more references for the 'Route description' section. There aren't any references for where the route is located.
- Map and coordinates aren't enough?—– 21:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- Please remove the comma in this line: 'SR 167 was designated in 1923, as a short connector from SR 7 to the Pennsylvania state line east of Richmond Center.'
- Done.—– 21:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- In this line, what is Richmond Center? Is there an article about it (if so, please wikilink it). Please describe what it is. 'SR 167 was designated in 1923, as a short connector from SR 7 to the Pennsylvania state line east of Richmond Center.'
- No link, but mentioned what it is.—– 21:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- Please change 'Around 1969' to 'In about 1969' or something similar, to me it sounds moar correct.
- Done.—– 21:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- In the 'Major intersections' section, you have a note for every destination except for SR 93. Could you please add a note :)?
- No. It's optional.—– 21:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Everything else looks good! I'll do the table once you go over my comments :) -Newyorkadam (talk) 20:28, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Newyorkadam
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | After edits, yes :) | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Only recent edits are by User:CycloneIsaac (the nominator). No edit wars. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | The Ohio State Route sign is in the public domain, the map is user-made, and the picture of the route is from Flickr, under the license 'Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic' which is allowed on WIkipedia! | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. | Congrats :D |
Final decision comment:
Passed! Nice article :) Looking forward to reviewing many more! -Newyorkadam (talk) 23:10, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Newyorkadam