Talk:Oh, Mr Porter!

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the French cinema task force.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Mills Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mills, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mills on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MillsWikipedia:WikiProject MillsTemplate:WikiProject MillsMills articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Comedy High‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Best known film?

The description of Oh, Mr. Porter as Hay's 'best known film' is a bit too subjective, IMHO. Figures in the trade papers suggest that Good Morning, Boys and Windbag the Sailor took considerably more money at the box office. IMHO this could use some rephrasing to make it clear that this is a value judgement applied by contemporary critics as distinct from an indication of the film's success at the time of its release.

The Ghost Train

The plot of the film was not new at the time. In 1931 The Ghost Train was made with a somewhat similar plot - gun-runners using the cover of a ghostly story to cover their activities.Peter Shearan 18:10, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find the quote but I believe Val guest once said he had written (at least a part of the) scripts for 'The Ghost Train' three times. As 'Oh Mr Porter' in 1937, The Arthur Askey version of 'The Ghost Train' in 1941 and 'The Runaway Bus' (Frankie Howerd and Margaret Rutherford) in 1955. All excellent films IMHO. 178.78.66.211 (talk) 21:59, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Oh, Mr Porter!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:13, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Opening credits.

In the article it says... "The title sequence uses scenes shot at a variety of locations on the Waterloo to Southampton railway line and also between Maze Hill and Greenwich in south-east London. According to John Huntley in his book Railways on Screen, "[t]he editor reversed his negative at one stage in preparing the title backgrounds, causing them to come out reversed on the final print".

This is clearly nonsense. By looking at the signals on the other line it's clear that the actual signals are facing towards the camera with the 'arm' of the semaphore pointing to the left therefore the film cannot possibly have been reversed. The film is not reversed left to right but it is reversed in time having been filmed from the back of a train, not the front, with the train travelling in the correct direction for the track. It's rather shocking that anybody could write a book about railways on screen and get something this basic so wrong. 178.78.66.211 (talk) 21:47, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Passage now deleted for the above reasons. 178.78.66.211 (talk) 23:10, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]