Talk:Octobri mense

Christianity: Texts / Catholicism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Religious texts (assessed as Low-importance).
	Catholic Church portal This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Low-importance).

Coat of arms 3rd opinion

I will be asking for a 3rd opinion about the coat of arms used on this page. I have discussed the issue on the talk page of User_talk:Xanderliptak#Coats_of_arms. I have no way to determine how user Xanderliptak designed this image and have not received an answer. I think NO coat of arms should be displayed here until the accuracy of the image has been verified, but do not not want to revert him again, hence will ask for a 3rd opinion. History2007 (talk) 22:18, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Um, you posted this here. That is a source. You provided it yourself. Oh, and perhaps the appropriate WikiProject on heraldry would be a better place to answer heraldic questions. While there, read up on who shield shapes are meaningless to a coat of arms, but the symbols are quite important. You haven't noticed that the symbols on each shield are the same and the same colour. That is a rather glaring mistake on your part. [tk] XANDERLIPTAK 22:48, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I searched for that image and it was very different from what you have. I will just wait for a 3rd opinion. History2007 (talk) 22:58, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it is different, I am not copying another artist's work, that would be a copyright violation and stealing as far as art is concerned. I am not trying to copy that image, I was copying the coats of arms. Which is the same. How about you stop looking at the fruit and wreath around the shield and actually look at the shield. That shield is the coat of arms, and the symbols on it are what is important. So, look at the symbols, and see they are the same. How many times must I point that out to you? How often are you going to ignore it? You could, as I suggested before, go to Coat of arms, Heraldry, Escutcheon (heraldry) and other articles to have found this out rather than deciding to be stubbornly ignorant. [tk] XANDERLIPTAK 09:08, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now that a 3rd editor arrived, commented and reverted, the formal third opinion I asked for no longer applies. There are 3 people now. History2007 (talk) 09:24, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]