Talk:Ochetellus glaber/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: IJReid (talk · contribs) 05:09, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Might as well take on this review, since this is the oldest species article nominated. From a quick glance the article looks good, although I do hate it when images cause section headers to shift, but I'm not sure if that's even a significant point to raise. Points will come soon. IJReid ^{{{T - C - D - R}}} 05:09, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Skipping to taxonomy because I like doing the lead last, there are a few odd quirks I think merrit mention. IJReid ^{{{T - C - D - R}}} 05:18, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"short lived" and "short-lived" are odd ways to describe a taxonomic placement, rewording might fix this
I don't know the significance of Verhandlungen der Zoologisch, link if possible, or otherwise mention why it is important
If it may be split, perhaps mention how it would be if there is literature on that
"I. itoi was described as a separate species, while I. itoi abbotti was recognised as a subspecies" this wording is odd, perhaps something similar to "I. itoi was described as a separate species, which includes the later-named I. itoi abbotti as a subspecies" (assuming the subspecies was named later)
"and in the 1950s I. itoi was first noted to be similar to O. glaber" maybe move this statement to the beginning of the next sentence
"It is commonly known as" perhaps mention the full name here just for simplicities sake
You should know I love phylogenies, but there is no mention of any relatives anywhere in the article I can find. Cladograms can be requested here if you find any.

Commencing work today. Sorry for keeping this late. Burklemore1 (talk) 22:37, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Burklemore1 and IJReid: Hello! What is the status of this review? Doesn't look like any progress has been made in over a month.--Dom497 (talk) 01:31, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I lost this one because of lack of action. I will close it unless something happens within the span of a week (5 days). IJReid ^{{{T - C - D - R}}} 04:41, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Closing review now. No progress IJReid ^{{{T - C - D - R}}} 00:02, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]