Talk:Occupational therapy/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tom (LT) (talk · contribs) 10:14, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will take up this review. As stated by Doc James, at first blush many parts of the article are unreferenced. This article contains many lists and some are strangely formatted. It is also US-heavy in the introductory history section. For these reasons (And given that the referencing hasn't been addressed since May) will quick fail this article.

Thanks for the nomination, but please remember Rome wasn't built in a day and good things come in time :). --Tom (LT) (talk) 10:14, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]