This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
The introductory paragraph of this short article concludes: "Pacification of the Araucanía was the name given by Chilean authorities to hide the military aspect of the incorporation." The assertion is dubious ("pacification" connotes military operations to native English-speakers, and this article is in English) and is not neutral in POV ("hide" connotes underhandedness, deviousness; "obscure" might be less contentious). May not this sentence be rewritten to, at the least, "Pacification of the Araucanía was the name given by Chilean authorities"? If not, should not the original author adduce some evidence that "pacification" was applied to the long campaign in a conscious attempt to obscure the martial aspects of the operation? Firstorm01:26, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]