Talk:Oberhasli goat
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Oberhasli goat article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 21 July 2010. The result of the discussion was speedy close. |
- Apparently that was the wrong venue for that proposal, as it was speedily closed as 'wrong forum.' Also, the responses received there seem to indicate that there is already a naming convention in place for goats. What is that general naming convention for goats, if anyone knows, and where is it specified? On List of goat breeds, it appears to be random, and my intent was & is to try to standardize the approach. To me, x goat (without parenthesis) makes simple sense as a naming convention, but there seemed to be some contrasting thought in the review, concerning a move of Oberhasli (goat) to Oberhasli goat (this page; one of the article page's current redirects) Comments? duff 10:01, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
I Like
[edit]this was a good article but i wish it had more info. 98.10.128.107 (talk) 18:30, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Agriculture articles
- Low-importance Agriculture articles
- C-Class Livestock articles
- Low-importance Livestock articles
- Livestock task force articles
- WikiProject Agriculture articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject United States articles