Talk:Oba Chandler/GA3

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Recent events have significantly changed the structure and content of the article and the latest edits, in my opinion, have left the short of the GA criteria. The article is no longe"r stable and the more recent edits are not entirely clear and concise. Wikipeterproject (talk) 04:27, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The "recent events" (Chandler's expected execution) are easily and quickly dealt with. I see no reason to list this article for GAR. Binksternet (talk) 05:29, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also see no reason to list this for GAR as Binksternet points out it would be easily fixed.--BabbaQ (talk) 07:26, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done GAR is done, GA status retained. Binksternet (talk) 04:54, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not exactly sure of the correct procedure for an individual reassessment, by it is my understanding that the process is initiated and concluded by a single user. Doesn't that mean that I, as the initiater, should also conclude it? Wikipeterproject (talk) 22:04, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- You're right. I should not have closed it. If you can continue this review yourself then do so. Note that prior to establishing this individual review you were supposed to have "Fix[ed] any simple problems yourself" and "Tag[ged] serious problems that you cannot fix". Was this done? Binksternet (talk) 05:09, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done I declare this GAR closed. No more comments for over a month.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:50, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]