Talk:Ob-Ugric languages

Languages High‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: Language & literature / Demographics & ethnography Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the language and literature of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the demographics and ethnography of Russia task force.

Old discussion

What was false about that statement? The source I gave was pretty clear. In any case I looked into it more and added another source. --Chroniclev 03:56, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is, Hungarian was split off by 1000 BC. The 'migration to Hungary in the 10th century' is simply impossible; in the 10th century, the precedessor of modern Hungary, the Principality of Hungary was already alive and well. Have a look at the article 'Hungary'. I think this is clear: you can't found a state in the Carpathian Basin if you have just left behind the future Ob-Ugrics, and you are still somewhere around the Urals.

Now about the date 1000 BC. Uralic linguists found the language had been split off at least 3000 years ago; if your 10th century AD were right, a Hungarian would understand Mansies! And I can tell you: I do not understand them (I'm a Hungarian.) I also gave two sources; but if you need, you can find more about the subject in the article History of Hungarian, or I can list all my books about Uralic studies (and there's a plenty of them.) --Cserlajos ^(talk) ^(contribs) 16:00, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Source and Tag Removal

Dear Kwamikagami, please, explain (1) why do you try to remove a source (Lyovin, Anatole V. (1997-03-06). An Introduction to the Languages of the World. Oxford University Press US. p. 55. ISBN 0-19-508116-1.), (2) where do your numbers come from and (3) why do you want to delete a citation needed tag (there is no other mention of the hypothetical nature of this group later in the text, so it is the only place I could put it). Thanks, KœrteFa {ταλκ} 18:09, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sorry, I see (after checking the articles about Khanty and Mansi) that your numbers come from Ethnologue and they are more recent than the source. So you don't have to answer (1) and (2).. KœrteFa {ταλκ} 18:38, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Next time, please, explain such edits [1] in your edit tag, so others can understand your motivations. KœrteFa {ταλκ} 18:43, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]