Talk:Oat Mountain (California)

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in California may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

NGS elevations

There are number of benchmarks on or near the summit of Oat Mountain. The NGS datasheets for these stations all state that they are at the top of the mountain but the elevations given vary. One normally expects the NAVD 88 elevation to be greater than the NGVD 29 elevation yet NAVD 88 elevations for all the benchmarks are less. At these coordinates VERTICON says the difference should be +2.769 feet. So I side steeped the issue by using the NGVD 29 elevation shown on the USGS topographic map and given on the Peakbagger page. droll [chat] 11:08, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]