Talk:Oakwood tube station

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit / in UK / in London Low‑importance

	Trains Portal

	London Transport Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject London Transport (assessed as Low-importance).

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Highest station claim

The trivia stating that Oakwood is the highest station on the Piccadilly line is incorrect. Google Earth shows Cockfosters Station to be at 100m above sea level. DavidUri 12:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure where Google Earth gets its altitutde data, but a check at the Ordnance Survey's Get-a-map site shows that Cockfosters station is between the 95m and 100m contour lines so the Trivia statement is clearly wrong. The statement was originally added on 2 May 2006 by User:IsarSteve and I have queried the source and the odd statement about the Urals mountain on his talkpage. --DavidCane 15:47, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The information has two sources.. I personally remember seeing the bronze plaque in the 1970s & the details also appear in the Piccadilly Line Managements (East Area) 1993 publication: Piccadilly Line Extension The Diamond Anniversary. It may not be the highest point on the Piccadilly Line, but in 1933 London Transport thought it was!!! --IsarSteve 07:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. Both a strange statement to want to commemorate on a plaque and odd that they would apparently get it wrong. I wonder what promoted the decision to erect the plaque - perhaps a visit from a Soviet delegation to see the new extension. --DavidCane 00:44, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second most northerly?

Epping, Theydon Bois, Cockfosters, High Barnet and Chesham are all further North than Oakwood.
See http://homepages.tesco.net/houseofsteel/geoff-files/sillymaps/tubegeo.jpg for evidence
Unless of course you meant second most northerly Piccadilly station —Preceding unsigned comment added by --AsparagusTips (talk) 14:48, 28 November 2008 (UTC)62.60.98.134 (talk) 14:44, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oakwood tube station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080318210033/http://www.ltmcollection.org/photos/ to http://www.ltmcollection.org/photos/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:00, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Checked :) VKZY^LUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 10:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]