Talk:Oak Lawn (Washington, D.C.)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: REDMAN 2019 (talk · contribs) 13:16, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
I'll take a look at this one. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 13:16, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
17th-19th centuries
[edit]- Ref 1 needs a author.
- Ref 2 has no url.
- Except for the last sentence, the third paragraph is entirely unsourced.
20th-21st centuries
[edit]- The second paragraph also is unsourced except for the last sentence
- Ref 14, 27, 28 and 29 have no urls or accessdates.
Main article
[edit]- There are quite a few sentences with 4, 5 or even 6 references. Per WP:SYNTH it's best just to have one, two at max.
Comments
[edit]There are a few issues to be addressed here, mainly with the sourcing. So I'm putting this on hold for now. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 12:40, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Ok, I think the issues have been corrected. Take a look when you get a chance. Thank you. APK whisper in my ear 06:10, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
- Well done. In my opinion this article now meets GA criteria. Passing. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 12:15, 7 December 2020 (UTC)