Jump to content

Talk:Oak Fire (2020)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 25 July 2022

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Page Moved, snowing (non-admin closure) PrisonerB (talk) 13:11, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Oak FireOak Fire (2020) – Another fire in 2022 is called Oak Fire, bigger than this one. — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:01, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per WP:PTOPIC. The 2022 Oak Fire has far more notability than the 2020 Oak Fire and most likely follows both primary usage and primary long-term significance. From what I can tell, the 2020 Oak Fire is only talked about by 2-3 news publications, while the 2022 Oak Fire is talked about by far more (and more notable) news publications. Roc0ast3r (talk) (contribs) 18:13, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:PTOPIC as well. Oak is a common place name in California and other places, we're likely to see future Oak Fires at some point that may also need distinguishing. See: River Fire (2021), River Fire (2020), River Fire (2018), River Complex Fire (2015), River Complex Fire (2020), etc. Penitentes (talk) 19:36, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per all preceding remarks. What more is there to say? This is a no-brainer. Anomalous+0 (talk) 20:43, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, there is one more very obvious thing: Oak Fire should be a DAB page. Anomalous+0 (talk) 20:47, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I knew that. Should have mentioned it.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:04, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.