Talk:O Cangaceiro

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Brazil Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

English variety

Oh, man. Sorry, I know we should be cordial here, but I can sincerely say: you're such a pain in the neck (to not say anything worse), Lugnuts. I don't know what I'll happen... maybe I'll be blocked but I don't care since it'll be explicit for everyone your true nature. "I am hard but I am fair". Seriously? Tsc, you are fair as well as Pol Pot was fair to Cambodians. "Oh my gosh, how can you insult Lugnuts, one of our masters?" Simply, because he's too fair. Take a look at his edits, and you'll see how TOTALLY fair Lugnuts is. He can't see someone editing one of "his articles", and can't help to do such useful edits (e.g. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Well, it's enough; otherwise, it'd take up too much space and one can say I'm arguing ad hominem).

Let's go to what really matters here: the discussion about this article. And, Lugnuts show us again how fair he is: "Brazil > Portuguese > Portugal > Europe > DMY." "Wow, such a brilliant syllogism!!" Hm... I'd probably call it a fallacy. Using this logic we should use British English for United States-related articles: United States > English > United Kingdom (> Europe >) DMY. Maybe we should use the same "reasoning" for India-related articles: India > English > United Kingdom (> Europe >) DMY. Even if you consider that English is a Germanic language you have the same "logic". So don't try to devise anything.

How about to try a Wikipedia's guideline? e.g. WP:RETAIN. Let's read: "When no English variety has been established and discussion cannot resolve the issue, the variety used in the first non-stub revision is considered the default. If no English variety was used consistently, the tie is broken by the first post-stub contributor to introduce text written in a particular English variety." Hm, I could be wrong now (but I don't think so) however I guess the first non-stub edit was this one. Hm, and who did this edit? I am. And, I used MDY i.e. American English. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 20:08, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brazil is not in the United States. It's not hard to grasp, is it? Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 05:52, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So what? Brazil is not in the United Kingdom (or Europe) too. Please, stop to use fallacies and try to argue with a guideline/policy like I did. It's not hard to grasp, is it? Gabriel Yuji (talk) 21:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep up with the personal attacks and pointy edits. You're doing just great! Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 06:44, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Show me a edit when you argued to keep the English variety using a guideline/policy, and not only editing warring? If I'm breaking the rules, you're too. Please, don't try to sound like you were a poor dear. When it was created it was formatted MDY. So it's the status quo, according to WP:RETAIN. You should reach consensus to change it instead of gaming. You're doing just great, too! Gabriel Yuji (talk) 16:24, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm adding the tag for mdy dates, not dmy dates. LOOK at the edit. Final warning. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 17:47, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you're such intelligent and I'm such a dumbass. You've added DMY at first ([6], [7], [8]) and then subtle you changed to MDY ([9]) while still defending DMY ([10]) and I didn't notice it. You knew you couldn't argue against a policy/guideline but you didn't care on it anymore. Now, you're only trying to have your edit at the article because I don't know why you always have to edit after someone edit in one of "your" articles. Congratulations! Gabriel Yuji (talk) 17:58, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Wow, you're such intelligent and I'm such a dumbass". Well, I've known that for sometime. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 07:05, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]