Talk:O (Cyrillic)

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: Language & literature Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the language and literature of Russia task force.

Proposed merge from Broad On

That article is about a variant letterform, not a distinct letter. Any objections? —Michael Z. 2008-07-01 23:52 z

Don't merge. The two are distinguished in scribal practice from the earliest sources (even in the Codex Suprasliensis), and even if at this period they are largely positional variants, from the late 16th century they are used also to make grammatical distinctions (which is still the case in modern Church Slavonic).Лудольф (talk) 12:36, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll remove the move notice. It looks like some repetitive material has crept into this article, and should be cleaned up. —Michael Z. 2008-11-27 02:30 z

Why is there, in this entry, a different pronunciation than the one the Russian Entry?

Specifically, in the Russian entry I found that the pronunciation is whereas in the English entry I found a Close-mid back rounded vowel which sounds different?

IsraelyHomoSapiens (talk) 14:03, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Other Variants of Cyrillic O

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To not merge, give that these distinct letters are best discussed separately, even if the pages are short. Klbrain (talk) 08:38, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If Broad On deserves its own article, others like Crossed O, Cyrillic Double O, O with left notch and O with open bottom need to be on this article, not only because they're similar to this letter but also because they're just variants. To those who object the article about Broad On to be merged into this article, why do you think it's distinguished from Cyrillic O, despite being considered similar? Besides the fact that those aforementioned pages only have small information. 4lepheus B4ron (talk) 10:30, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. They are similar, but not the same. Also some of your named letters aren't just variants, they're different letters. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 17:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i don't think a computer could even handle a "whole cake of articles" combined together so that's not a good idea... — Preceding undated comment added 22:55, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Oppose per Kepler-1229b. Great Mercian (talk) 01:22, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.