Talk:OR-7/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jclemens (talk · contribs) 04:01, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Nicely readable prose.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	No issues noted.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Excellent referencing.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	No issues noted.
	2c. it contains no original research.	Speculation is cited to RS.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	I fixed an improperly truncated direct quote, otherwise appears clear per Earwig's tool.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	No issues noted.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	No issues noted.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Acknowledges agricultural/livestock as well as conservation aspects of topic.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No issues noted.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	All OK.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	No issues noted.
	7. Overall assessment.	Pass after first read through. Not usual for a trivial copyright error to have been the only thing I caught.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.