Talk:OMICS Creations

Existing article under OMICS Creations Please do not redirect to Publishing Page as this article describes about movies/films related stuff. Removed the facebook followers sentence as it may comes under promotional material. Movieking007 (talk) 14:39, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why you are redirecting films and movies page OMICS Creations to Scientific Publishing OMICS Publishing Group. CU is required and/or investigation required about these people who are representing as experts but behaving as culprits. This is a Preposterous activity at WPMovieking007 (talk) 05:29, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about films, movies as per wiki standards it falls under notable company. Removed the facebook followers sentence as it may comes under promotional material, Come to the discussion before making any redirection to un-known pages.Movieking007 (talk) 05:32, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about an insignificant branch of a minor company, notable mainly because of its low-quality activities. There is no justification for a separate article. As I have proposed at OMICS Publishing Group, that article should be moved to "OMICS Group" and one or two lines about this branch added to that article. In addition, please keep the discussion centralized at Talk:OMICS Publishing Group. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 14:41, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Is there an AfD or some other type of consensus to support the redirect? (I really haven't looked around so that may be a stupid question). If not, I suggest we file this at AfD. Regards, MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 03:20, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No AFD is needed to redirect an article. --Randykitty (talk)

04:54, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Agreed, but in this instance it might be sensible to get seek consensus there. I think we all know how it would turn out. SmartSE (talk) 10:15, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Re writing the content as per Wiki standards. OMICS Creations is producing around 6 films, each film budget is around fifty crores equivalent to US$65 Milion for six films as per box office reports of those films. I hope it is not a small company.Movieking007 (talk) 06:29, 18 February 2014 (UTC) Why you are redirecting films and movies page OMICS Creations to Scientific Publishing OMICS Publishing Group. CU is required and/or investigation required about these people who are representing as experts but behaving as culprits. This is a Preposterous activity at WP. I request sock poppet investigation on these culprits.Movieking007 (talk) 06:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't looked all the way through but I believe there are still some copyvio issues with this new version, for example "Veteran actors like Sarath Kumar, Krishnam Raju, character artist Ashis Vidyarthi and Comedians Ali and M.S. Narayana played their bit to entertain the audience" looks directly copied from this source [1]. This article is still listed at WP:Copyright problems and I would recommend that the rewrite is not moved into mainspace until it has been reviewed by an uninvolved administrator or copyright clerk, as per the normal process for listings there. January (talk) 08:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Duplication detector shows additional instances of copied or closely paraphrased sentences. January (talk) 11:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, do not recreate without showing that this branch of OMICS actually is independently notable. If their movies are in the same quality range as their scientific meetings and journals, there will probably be enough sources criticizing this branch, too. If they're just mediocre, it might simply be ignored and then does not cross the threshold of notability. --Randykitty (talk) 11:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Of the three completed films listed in the article before it was redirected, two of them are dubbed versions of existing films [2][3], so it seems that they have completed only one original film so far. January (talk) 18:01, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]