Talk:OK Golf/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk · contribs) 05:58, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: NegativeMP1 (talk · contribs) 01:09, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
OK, a nice, short article. I'll review this one as soon as I'm done reviewing Cancer (song). λ NegativeMP1 01:09, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Woah! Thank you! my prayers have been answered TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 04:08, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Quick note: I had a few doubts before I nominated this article because I felt it was incomplete and missing important information (particularly in the gameplay section). TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 05:58, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- I can definitely see that viewpoint, but at the same time there's plenty of cases of mobile games like this having very little to say about gameplay, limited development information, and few critic reviews. As long as it addresses the subjects key points with enough detail, is comprehensible, and doesn't violate any wiki rules, I personally think it's fine. This article would definitely fall apart at a place like FAC, though. λ NegativeMP1 08:15, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, one more thing: If you plan on responding this week, I will (very likely) not be available; I have finals, and I'd like to ensure I do well. :) TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 01:54, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- I can definitely see that viewpoint, but at the same time there's plenty of cases of mobile games like this having very little to say about gameplay, limited development information, and few critic reviews. As long as it addresses the subjects key points with enough detail, is comprehensible, and doesn't violate any wiki rules, I personally think it's fine. This article would definitely fall apart at a place like FAC, though. λ NegativeMP1 08:15, 7 December 2024 (UTC)