Talk:Nymphotomy

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's Health

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Speedy deletion

Please do not remove the notice from pages you created yourself. Aurora north (WikiDesk) 11:30, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reminding me. I've added a {{hangon}} tag: this article is currently in the process of being written -- nymphotomy/nymphectorm are specific terms for genital cutting, which can be applied both in the context of labiaplasty and in the context of female genital mutilation. This is a valid stub on a verifiable topic which can be expanded into a more detailed article later, and I'll provide references in a moment, if you'll let me. -- The Anome 11:35, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please now unprotect the article, so it can be expanded? -- The Anome 11:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The page is not protected and never has been. Auroranorth, please stop tagging this for delEtion as it does not meet the criteria. Discuss! —Moondyne 11:53, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second admin opinion:

Yes, avoid creating sub-stubs. You can use a sandbox in your user space for creations in progress.
No, even if you think a speedy tag is inappropriate, do not remove it from your article.
Yes, the stub has had sufficient content and context, it did not meet the criteria and I wouldn't have deleted it.
No, a protection tag is only for notification, it does not protect a page, and page protection wouldn't have been appropriate anyway after both tags were reincluded.

Femto 12:24, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]