Talk:Nyctography
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
(Encoding scheme)
[edit]Any description of the system of dots and strokes ?
Any sample ?{{subst:unsigned2 10:46, 22 September 2012|AlainD}}
- I added a link to [1] which has both. Maybe more information from there can be integrated into the article. --David-Sarah Hopwood ⚥ (talk) 20:08, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- I can't tell w/o research whether DS wanted the "dots in corners, lines along edges" description i see, or to know some exact codes. But one size of dot, and one length of line suffices to cover 2**6 or 64 characters, i.e. pretty plausible for coming up with 23 "naturalistic" representations of letters and 3 arbitrary ones that have to be pretty much memorized. That's enuf to satisfy me that i'd reproduce something close to his exact scheme if i created my own, and i wouldn't put much more value on knowing how close i'd come to his.
--Jerzy•t 07:45, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- I can't tell w/o research whether DS wanted the "dots in corners, lines along edges" description i see, or to know some exact codes. But one size of dot, and one length of line suffices to cover 2**6 or 64 characters, i.e. pretty plausible for coming up with 23 "naturalistic" representations of letters and 3 arbitrary ones that have to be pretty much memorized. That's enuf to satisfy me that i'd reproduce something close to his exact scheme if i created my own, and i wouldn't put much more value on knowing how close i'd come to his.
Writing 1/4 vs. .25
[edit] I commented on the edit where i made that change by saying "25 times the precision". An error of +/- 1/8" = an error of +/-.125", and (since 5x.25 =1.25, duh) indeed +/-.005 is 25 times that precision. But i needed to see that writ down to be confident in it.[blush]
--Jerzy•t 07:45, 3 June 2016 (UTC)