Jump to content

Talk:Nyctibatrachus mewasinghi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Nyctibatrachus mewasinghi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Grungaloo (talk · contribs) 23:57, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AryKun - only a few comments on this one! Let me know once you've had a chance to review. grungaloo (talk) 23:57, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    See comments Issues addressed
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
    Sources check out, no copyvio.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Major aspects covered. Limited sources exist for this so good coverage of what's available.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Meets NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    No recent reverts or evidence of edit warring
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Appropriate images and captions.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    See comments Passed!

Comments

[edit]
  • Could add a pushpin map but not necessary for GA.
  • Male/Female picture labels in speciesbox should be capitalized.
  • "The following cladogram shows relationships among three species," - "shows relationships among the three species". Since you just listed these 3 in the previous sentence I think you can make this definite.
  • "The side of the body is slightly lighter than the back, and underside is mainly off-white," - "and the underside is mainly off-white"
  • "the discs on third finger and fourth toe being well-developed and slightly wider than the finger and toe, respectively" - the discs on the third finger and fourth toe...
  • Grungaloo, all done. AryKun (talk) 12:15, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks! I'm happy to promote this. Congratulations on another great article and thanks for your work as always! grungaloo (talk) 15:58, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.