Talk:Nurses' Health Study

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Cardiology task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AddisonBlacksmith.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Summary of results; links to other mass studies

Would be nice to have in the article. And some links to other mass heath studies such as the Framingham heart study (sp?). 80.2.192.24 (talk) 00:01, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reasons for NOT doing longitudinal studies are numerous: cost, difficulty finding sponsorship, potential conflict of interest in sponsorship, etc. MaynardClark (talk) 17:16, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism Section

This study has come under recent criticism by other large scale epidemiological studies, which should be noted. 68.232.186.147 (talk) 13:42, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any links or Pubmed IDs? NW (Talk) 15:47, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the epic hormone therapy disaster comes to mind as being one of the spawn of the Nurses' Health Study. I have to say, it's a little baffling to see a booster list of 4 major results with no mention of that. --Gwern (contribs) 17:20 10 January 2015 (GMT)