Talk:Nuria Bermúdez/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 00:37, 14 January 2010 (UTC) After reading through this article multiple times to get an idea about it, I have decided to fail the GAN, because I have found a large number of issues, some minor, but some major as well:[reply]

Lead should be expanded a bit
"Her boasts that they would have sex five or six times every night led her to numerous appearances on Spanish chatshows, in particular Crónicas Marcianas." probably cited in the one at the end of the paragraph, but if not then it needs a cite.
The glamour modelling section is not only referenced, but worded rather poorly. Some of the language either needs a cite or needs to be modified.
The following section (sex etc.) has no structure whatsoever, it's just a slew of one sentence paragraphs.
"Bermúdez famously announced that she had slept with at least six first-team players," where and when? It sounds like "she did this but beckham got all this attention" which is just distracting to the article.
"Although it is generally assumed that Beckham was not one of her conquests," who assumes? Bad language for an article.
The chunk about her and David Beckham read as if she caused the two to break things off, which it's pretty clear they haven't.
Acting/singing career is mainly unreferenced.
IMDb is fine to use as a source on some things, but not for use on criticism and the like. Find a source that deals with that.
The FIFA section is not very good on structure either, though "slightly" better.
"Ever since Dani's been with Nuria, he turns up to training and it doesn't look like he's slept under a bridge". Cite needed.
Megaporn as an external link? Uh, no.
"She was determined to prove to the Spanish audience that she had no shame and was going to become famous no matter what." Been removed, but you definitely can't have sentences like that. even with a cite I'd be iffy.

This article definitely needs a restructuring before I could consider it a GA. Do some more work on it, then go for a peer review. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 00:37, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]