Jump to content

Talk:Nuclear power phase-out/to do

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • Anti-nuclear organizations make the claim phase-outs were on the rise while pro-nuclear organizations claim nuclear energy was booming. IMO, this is one of the most important issues that the article has to deal with. A good place for this is the introduction. Some (few) statistics are at (World Nuclear Power Statistics 2004 - [1]). An illustrative graph could be a good idea.
  • The country section needs to be expanded. Especially the following countries (along with possible references):
Asia:
  1. China [2] [3]
  2. India [4], [5]
  3. Iran [6]
  4. South Korea [7], Kazakhstan [8], Japan [9]
  5. Pakistan [10], [11],[12] (Section I History),(Compare also Khan Affair) [13]
Europe:
  1. France [14] [15]
  2. Russia [16] [17] [18] [19]
  3. Great Britain [20] [21]
  4. Ukraine [22] [23]
  5. Norway, Denmark, Greece, Poland
  6. Czech Republic [24]
  7. Romania [25]
Americas
  1. US [26] [27]
  2. Canada, Mexico , Argentina, Brazil [28]
Africa
  1. South Africa [29], [30](Koeberg station) [31]
  • A further argument for a phase-out could be workstations. The German Minister Jürgen Trittin claims more new jobs had been created by renewable energy than could have been by nuclear energy.
  • The references need to be put at the end.
  • A section at the end needs to discuss future perspectives for phase-outs/nuclear energy. (e.g. [32]

Start a discussion