Talk:Nowell Codex

	Anglo-Saxon England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

British Library Low‑importance

	This article is related to the British Library. Please copy assessments of the article from the most relevant WikiProject template to this one as needed.British LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/British LibraryTemplate:WikiProject British LibraryBritish Library-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Digital images

For such an old and important document, it is unfortunate that the only external link in this article is to a google image search. Is there a way to make higher quality images from the British Library? Jeff Carr (talk) 10:05, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Manuscripts, codices, books ...

This article is extremely confusing. Is it talking about a single 'volume' or two? Looking up 'manuscript' and 'codex' (for which there is no link) and comparing to how these terms (as well as 'book') are used throughout the article the reader could conclude that this is simultaneously a single volume and two distinct volumes (codices?). And if only the second 'manuscript' is known as the Nowell Codex why does the article talk about the first manuscript and/or codex (or whatever it is) at all? 87.113.170.112 (talk) 12:07, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It says "The current codex is a composite of at least two manuscripts, the first manuscript and the second manuscript.The main division is into two totally distinct books which were apparently not bound together until the 17th century. The first of these dates from the 12th century and contains four works of prose. It is the second, older manuscript that is famous." Isn't that clear enough? It was two books with no connection that were later bound together for convenience, so now it is one book with two manuscripts. This is a common situation. The whole book, as it exists now, is the Nowell Codex. Johnbod (talk) 12:12, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's still confusing. It says "The current codex is a composite of at least two manuscripts ..." and then in the next paragraph "This second manuscript is popularly known as the Nowell codex..." So is the Nowell Codex, the subject of the article, the composite of two manuscripts or just the second manuscript? 91.125.136.9 (talk) 09:10, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just the second, as is clearly said. But the lead gives Cotton Vitellius A. xv (both) as its subject. Johnbod (talk) 10:25, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]