Talk:Novy Mir

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Russia: Language & literature / History / Mass media Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the language and literature of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the mass media in Russia task force.

Soviet Union Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Old talk

Support the Split. Splitting would make sense. Greenshed 11:42, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so, there's hardly enough material for two articles. Grue 20:24, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

support. The amount of material is irrelevant. These are different things, hence different articles. Wikipedia is not paper. `'mikka 21:29, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support. They are clearly of different importance. Would even suggest removing NY section altogether. Mhym 06:05, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Against. I am against the split. In the 1960s the magazine continued the dissident tradition of the first (NY) Novy Mir; there is a clear connection between the two. --Badvibes101 (talk) 03:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I almost did the split myself, but then i looked at the talk page. If there is indeed a "clear connection" between the two, i can't really see it in the article body. If the article can show it, then it really shouldn't be split. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 14:53, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I re-wrote the article (which needed a clean-up); tried to show the link between the two. Hope I've made it clear why we don't need the split. --Badvibes101 (talk) 11:16, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support: There is no historical connection (a vague "dissident tradition" is not enough, and in any case the Soviet magazine was not "dissident" except to a limited extent at certain times), and no one who comes to the entry will be looking for the obscure NY magazine. The NY should be split off or deleted, and the entry considerably expanded for the Soviet version, one of the most important literary magazines of the 20th century. Languagehat (talk) 13:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Split done. Clearly different subjects. They were sitting in the same page, because it was created in early wikipedia days where style was not clear. It was not split before because not many really care about the topic. `'Míkka >t 16:16, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cover of early issue

The official website has a cover image (in low-res) of the July 1925 issue (No. 7). Perhaps someone could work out the copyright and upload it here so it can be used in the infobox? —Hugh (talk) 01:56, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]