Talk:Novus Biologicals

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

AmyChamberlain (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
Rachel.giesler (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was page moved. ukexpat (talk) 19:59, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:AmyChamberlain/Novus Biologicals → Novus Biologicals — Created using a user page, now needs to be moved to live Wikipedia.

Done JPG-GR (talk) 05:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

This is an interesting company in Colorado that provided materials to many of the labs at CU Boulder while I was attending. It was interesting to me to find out that the company was founded by a woman, and that she has succedded in growing the company, but still managed to hold on to their mission of furthering science.

Rachel.giesler (talk) 15:49, 23 November 2009 (UTC)rachel.giesler[reply]

You are apparently an intern at the company (http://www.linkedin.com/in/rachelgiesler), so please see the COI message on your talk page. – ukexpat (talk) 16:57, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spammy

I am afraid that this article, after further contributions by people associated with the company, is getting more spammy. When I have time, I will despam. – ukexpat (talk) 16:56, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]