Talk:Novi Zagreb – istok

Croatia: Zagreb Mid‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Zagreb task force.

Moving Novi Zagreb Istok to Novi Zagreb - istok

I created {{Zagreb_districts}} which has official names od districts in it, so it would be great if this page had was titled by official name of the district, so the bolding in the template works. Destination page was a redirect anyway. --Dijxtra 19:07, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- except that the title should be "Novi Zagreb - Istok" with a uppercase "I." English cardinal directions are uppercase when part of a placename. 129.252.70.25 21:22, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am unfamiliar with this topic but if the English translation is indeed "New Zagreb - east" then shouldn't the article preferably be called "East New Zagreb"?—jiy (talk) 05:26, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Jiy raises a concern over the move target- does istok translate to east? Shouldn't the target then be East Novi Zagreb? --Maru (talk) Contribs 16:21, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Result

This one was at WP:RM for quite a while. The basic descision here is that "Novi Zagreb - istok" followed the naming conventions of the other Zagreb districts and the others appear to have not. "East New Zagreb" might be more correct overall but it would be an entirely new naming convention for this article group.

There seemed to be more questions then actual opposition to the move, so if someone decides on a better name for this (and possibly the other Zagreb district articles) feel free to put it on WP:RM again. WhiteNight ^{T | @ | C} 21:20, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

e prijevod je kriminalno los