Talk:Novgorod Codex

Russia: Technology & engineering / Language & literature / Science & education / History / Religion Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the language and literature of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the science and education in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the religion in Russia task force.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Correct category?

Please see Category talk:Earliest known manuscripts by language. Enaidmawr (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bogomilism References

User Mladifilozof added a reference needed tag to a sentence linking the codex to bogomilism. The subject is extensively covered in the references already listed in the article, for instance, in Zaliznyak's "Problemy izucheniya Novgorodskogo kodeksa XI veka, naidennogo v 2000 g". Some quotes:

В религиозном отношении это были в большинстве своем последователи павликианства-дуалистического учения, в дальнейшем послужившего историческим источником идеологии богомильства.

From a religious point of view these were mainly the followers of a dualistic Paulicianism teaching, which later became a historical source for bogomilism.

(p 207)

Наиболее распространенной и активной ересью в Slavia Orthodoxa X века было богомильство. Продолжала существовать и более древняя ересь, историческим ответвлением которой было богомильство, - павликианство. По-видимому, к какой-то из разновидностей этих еретических течений принадлежал и автор рассматриваемых сочинений.

Bogomilism was the most active and widespread heresy in 10th century Slavia Orthodoxa. Another more ancient heresy also persisted which later branched off into bogomilism, namely Paulicianism. Apparently, the author of the codex was a member of one of these heretical movements.

(p 208)

По мнению Е. Е. Голубинского, Андреян был богомил (см. [Иванов 1925:39]). Можно предполагать, что по своей биографии и характеру деятельности Андреян и писец Новгородского кодекса были сходны.

According to EE Golubinskiy, Andreyan was a bogomil (see Ivanov 1925:39). One can assume that Andreyan and the author of the Novgorod codex has a similar background and modus operandi.

(p 209)

And so on. I provided my own rough translation for the sake of clarity. Since these works are already listed in the article, I don't see the need to further reference individual statements to specific pages or paragraphs. Flyboy Will (talk) 09:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]