Talk:Nothing to Hide (Heroes)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nothing to Hide (Heroes) redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Nothing to Hide (Heroes). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this redirect. You may wish to ask factual questions about Nothing to Hide (Heroes) at the Reference desk.

Television: Episode coverage / Heroes Low‑importance

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This redirect is supported by the Heroes task force.

Style

Should all the episode guides for Heroes be done like this one? I mean with the links at the top of the page that link to the different people?ParalysedBeaver 03:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did the same thing for the pilot episode, then someone reverted back to a scene-by-scene synopsis. So, the short answer: it depends.Toquinha 07:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. I recommended the scene by scene over your method. No offense, but trying to divid up episode data to character specific sections of an epispde article just isn't seemingly, especially as the character's interact. Character articles already do that. I'd appreciate it if you took the hint and tried something different. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 08:04, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So should we edit this one to be like all the previous episodes?ParalysedBeaver 15:06, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, probably. I'm not sure how to proceed because I don't want it to be like the various others that have been tagged for cleanup. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 16:54, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The last episode before this had a pretty good style, maybe we should copy it. ParalysedBeaver 11:06, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyediting

This synopsis is written using short, choppy sentences describing too many little details of the story, making it hard to "see the forest for the trees." I'd fix it myself, except that I missed a few scenes when watching that episode.

I'm in the process of editing it now, as that tag's been there for awhile now and I've got some time. I got about half of it edited and will work on the remaining half either after I get off work or tomorrow at the latest. I'm relatively new here, and have read the guides, so if any experienced user wishes to take a look at what I've got so far, it would be appreciated. Oh, and did Mohinder have any opening/ending statements, as there is none listed and I can't remember. If he did, I'd imagine those should be in here, but I have no way of finding them unless I can find a transcript or if someone can post it here. 27 November 06 -.User:Navex

Timeline...

Just having watched it about 15 minutes ago, the plotline here isn't in chronological order. Should it be? I mean, yes, it does help understand it better, but it isn't accurate in recounting the episode. 211.30.223.128 10:49, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ending

Doesn't this episode end with Niki aiming her sniper rifle at DL's head? I think that's pretty important..... Smiley200 08:11, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, that was "Homecoming"....... silly me.. Smiley200 15:57, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move

(cur | prev) 14:07, 15 November 2008‎ Snigbrook (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (11,754 bytes) (0)‎ . . (moved Nothing to Hide (Heroes) to Nothing to Hide: disambiguation page was deleted and articles now have hatnotes; this is the primary topic) (undo | thank)

Well that's not the case now. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:59, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moved back. You have not established any other primary topic, and capitalization is sufficient disambiguation. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 19:49, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It evidently is not, since the dab page is largely made up of entries with "H". The onus is to establish primary topic, not just assume it. Why not the album? There is no primary topic here. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:42, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 August 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move after over two weeks and a relisting period. Cúchullain ^t/c 14:48, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing to Hide → Nothing to Hide (Heroes) – The parenthesis (Heroes) was removed in 2008, but the dab page Nothing to hide lists many subjects with a "H" capital. The TV episode is nothing approaching absolute majority subject in Google Books. If anything nothing to hide argument a privacy-related argument is the most common topic. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:40, 9 August 2015 (UTC)--Relisted. Cúchullain ^t/c 13:53, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - The capitalization provides sufficient natural disambiguation. The DAB page is where it should be and searching for the term will end up there. Primary topic is not relevant here, only disambiguation, which is satisfied. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 11:14, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't approach majority subject either - there is no majority subject. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:14, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's not what I said... I don't even know what you mean by "majority subject". -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 16:21, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. There is no "sufficient" disambiguation here, since there are multiple topics that use the capital-H (indeed, most topics on the disambiguation page uses the capital "H"). The current title should redirect to the disambiguation page. A 2006 episode of a cancelled TV show is a very unlikely topic to find here. We are not a TV show wiki site, we do compile other information. -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 05:20, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- There is only one that has an actual article (the album), and that is basically a track listing. Note that disambiguation is all about article titles, not subjects. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 16:21, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - There are 3 other "capital-H" articles, one using a subtitle for natural disambiguation, two others using parenthetical disambiguation; that's more than just one album article; so the articles exist. And this is still an aging episode from about a decade ago, and not a TV show itself. -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 04:22, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - There are three redirects; they do not count as articles. the only other articles are of a non-notable album and magic show. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 17:09, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      - They are not redirects, they are articles. the book with NATURALDAB articlename, the show with parenthetical disambiguator, the album. As they exist on Wikipedia as articles, and you haven't nominated them for deletion, then they are prima facie notable. And what makes this episode notable? There's only a single reference, and the actress was not nominated per 59th Primetime Emmy Awards. There are a lot of candidacies for nominations, but that doesn't mean they are all significant. Indeed, the reference used links to a forum, and the link is dead. -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 04:13, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nothing to Hide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070604173902/http://goldderbyforums.latimes.com:80/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/1106078764/m/53610293? to http://goldderbyforums.latimes.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/1106078764/m/53610293

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:29, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]