Talk:Notehall

Entry Probably Outdated

This article seems to be mostly outdated, as Notehall doesn't seem to be online anymore (at least not at the address provided). A disclaimer should at least be provided until the page is updated further, no? 76.111.77.55 (talk) 08:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism Section

I've added a criticism section to this article to balance it a bit. Octavabasso (talk) 14:08, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And now... looking through the history of the article, it is clear that someone on in past had added a "controversy" section, but that was removed. If anyone wants to remove the criticism section I put in, I suggest discussing the merits of that here, first. Octavabasso (talk) 16:40, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And now... someone, probably with Notehall, is reverting that section, just as happened last time. Octavabasso (talk) 01:44, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You will be pleased to know, Octavabasso (talk), that "Criticism" section has remained intact. I have added just a little to it, and cleaned up the page a little. Good work! This is a well-balanced article. --FeralOink (talk) 17:55, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Geography class 10 ncert

Class 10 ncert chapter 2 forest and wild life resources 2409:40C4:18E:B8DD:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 16:04, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]