Talk:Not Afraid/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ashliveslove (talk · contribs) 04:50, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- Dead links found.
Resolve the issue and will make sure it gets a GA ASHUIND 07:27, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for reviewing. It should be good now. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 10:37, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Final Analysis
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- Not much concerns here. ASHUIND 05:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- No such concerns here. Article has been searched thoroughly for such references. ASHUIND 05:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- All such aspects have been covered. ASHUIND 05:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fine here.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- All images are proper till the review date and well captioned. ASHUIND 05:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: