Talk:Nostradamus Effect
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 5 May 2022. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Pseudoscience
[edit]Calling a show about unfounded pseudoscience ceases to be "documentary" when it gives crackpots with a book to shill equal time with people who are bound by the limitation of not making their facts up.76.112.254.35 (talk) 06:40, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.203.167.199 (talk) 04:50, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Wow So NPOV
[edit]I think every single sentence in this article reflects the author's opinions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.250.234.143 (talk) 14:48, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- The items about the Mayan Calendar are well sourced. The rest of the article seems synth from the Mayan sources and/or editorializing. If you tore out what was unsourced, there would not be much left. Needs a lot of work. 2602:304:788B:DF50:8CDD:5461:389A:631B (talk) 20:46, 15 May 2017 (UTC)