Talk:Northern Raiders

Requested move

Northern Raiders → New York Raiders — The Northern Raiders have changed their name to New York Raiders. The article would need to be moved over a redirect for the San Diego Mariners, a defunct sports team that was once called NY Raiders. A hatnote can be used should the move be accepted. LunarLander // talk // 03:08, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update

There is now an article at New York Raiders rather than a redirect. This is due to a WikiProject Ice Hockey convention of have an article for each location at which a franchise is based. I don't believe this is a good use of a namespace that's in demand, I think that WP Ice Hockey should consider following the lead of other sports and having a single article for each club or franchise but that is another debate. Regarding this move request, I believe the hockey article at New York Raiders should be moved to New York Raiders (WHA). LunarLander // talk // 15:31, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The only hesitation I have with this is that the WHA was (arguably) a top level professional league like the NBA, NFL, MLB, NHL etc. Whereas, this team is a semi-professional team with likely less significance. I might suggest changing this page to a disambig page itself and then link both from this page. Because I don't think the semi-pro rugby team would be considered a primary topic over a top level professional hockey team. -DJSasso (talk) 16:36, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Easily solved. I would argue that the New York WHA team was better known by its second name. That article should be moved to New York Golden Blades (over its existing redirect), which would free this article to move to New York Raiders with a hat note pointing anyone looking for the old WHA team to its new location. Reso lute 21:06, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that would be a good idea. -DJSasso (talk) 21:07, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I support this. Golden Blades does seem to be clearly the more popular name for the hockey team. LunarLander // talk // 17:46, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would say go ahead and make the moves you have listed below. If you can't let me know and I can move them. -DJSasso (talk) 15:40, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I have moved them and changed all the redirects I think. Just have to wait for the jobqueue to update the "What links here" for all the pages that have the template transcluded. I will check back in a few hours if I remember to make sure any straglers are fixed. -DJSasso (talk) 11:39, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. LunarLander // talk // 15:31, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Current consensus is

Northern Raiders → New York Raiders

New York Raiders → New York Golden Blades LunarLander // talk // 15:34, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New York Raiders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.rleague.com/db/article.php?id=9895
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.rleague.com/db/article.php?id=14485
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.rleague.com/db/article.php?id=16493
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100211200854/http://rleague.com/db/article.php?id=20471 to http://www.rleague.com/db/article.php?id=20471

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:48, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]