Talk:Northeastern Neo-Aramaic

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Endangered languages, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Endangered languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Endangered languagesTemplate:WikiProject Endangered languagesEndangered languages articles

Languages

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Assyria High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Assyria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Assyrian-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyrian articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Western Asia

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

NENA

Influence of Targumic Aramaic on Jewish NENA? I don't believe this has ever been documented, or even asserted. Influence from Hebrew, certainly, but not from older Aramaic. It is definitely not the case that Targumic Aramaic is to Jewish NENA as Classical Syriac is to Christian NENA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.112.64.79 (talk) 14:45, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Division along religious lines fallacy

This is a common misconception created by the popular SIL categorisation. They probably imagined that since Alqosh and Telkef share a distinct dialect and "historical" Jalu and Baz have another similar dialect, one can divide NENA to Assyrian and Chaldean. This is very problematic since it ignores the "Assyrian" dialect of Urmi whose speakers belong to the Chaldean Church and the dialects of Bakhdida, Bartella, Bashiqa... which is quite close to Alqosh but whose speakers are historically Syriac Orthodox.--Rafy talk 19:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Surith" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Surith. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. PamD 12:32, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]