Talk:Northampton loop

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	September 18, 2018

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article. The editor who added the request suggests the following:

add a geographic map

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Northamptonshire Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northamptonshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northamptonshire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorthamptonshireWikipedia:WikiProject NorthamptonshireTemplate:WikiProject NorthamptonshireNorthamptonshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Northampton loop line.

Untitled

From the article:

When in 1834 the route of the main line was being decided, Northampton objected[1] to having a railway station. This meant that the Kilsby Tunnel had to be built to bypass Northampton

According to my book Rugby's Railway Heritage the London and Birmingham Railway wasn't built through Northampton because the gradients were too steep. G-Man * 22:29, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's credible too, but clearly (since the loop line manages the climb), it needs support. The "Northampton didn't want it" story has wide currency, but the citation I found is someone's personal website and doesn't cite its source. Yet another version I heard was that Northampton was too far off the direct line and it would be easier to pop a little tunnel under Kilsby, same as at Linslade. We really need a primary source - without it, I don't think we can say anything. Do you want to change it for now to something like "a variety of reasons for this have been proposed and contemporary evidence is needed to provide a definitative explanation"? --Concrete Cowboy 17:40, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the early locomotives of the 1830s weren't powerful enough to cope with anything but the slightest gradients. By the 1870s however locomotives had become a lot more powerful. To be more specific my book states: Northampton had been exceptionally unlucky as far as railway connections were concerned. The London & Birmingham could not, with gradients that had been set for the main line, pass via the town

G-Man * 20:49, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Location of southern end of loop line

The article states that the junction is at Hanslope Junction, while the info box lists Roade as one of the "termini".

If the former is correct, then the info box should also be edited to reflect the fact that Hanslope Junction is within Milton Keynes Unitary Authority or (ceremonially) Buckinghamshire. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.94.137.1 (talk) 14:03, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Northampton loop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130903160013/http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/RAkilsby.htm to http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/RAkilsby.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:01, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]