Talk:North and Middle Littleton

It is requested that an image or photograph of North and Middle Littleton be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Worcestershire may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Worcestershire Low‑importance

	Worcestershire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The word probably occurs no less than four times in this short text. Probabilities usually express an opinion. The Wiki MOS probably insists that the encyclopedia only reports facts, and 'probabilities' only get a mention when exeptionally well referenced and attributed to a very notable source who is very probably right. These probabilities will probably have to be cut if sources for them canotn be found and cited. --Kudpung (talk) 18:44, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations & re-written article

I have created a reworded version of this article which can be found here -

Talk:North and Middle Littleton/Temp

I hope this addresses the copyright violations associated with the old article. Bleaney (talk) 19:56, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on North and Middle Littleton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090826002011/http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk:80/main/w-vh/w-visits/w-findaplace/w-middlelittletontithebarn to http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/main/w-vh/w-visits/w-findaplace/w-middlelittletontithebarn/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:38, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]