Talk:North Side station (Trinity Metro)

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 6 May 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 17:38, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

North Side station → North Side station (Trinity Metro) – WP:TWODABS situation with North Side station (PAAC); no clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC between the two. It's unclear to me what the proper disambiguator would be for this station. This does mean that North Side station would become a disambiguation page. Mackensen (talk) 14:15, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oppose~~ – If you don't even have a proposal, please to not use the RM mechanism. Dicklyon (talk) 05:49, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @Dicklyon: Your views on a good disambiguator would have been welcome; in any event I've picked one. Mackensen (talk) 11:19, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks; that was your job here. Now I am neutral, as it remains unclear in a TWODABS situation whether both need disambiguators, and if so whether you intend to create a disambig page at North Side station. Ball's still in your court to flesh out your proposal. Dicklyon (talk) 14:42, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    - I saw no reason to state the obvious, having said that there was no clear primary topic, a disambiguation page would be the natural result. If you have an opinion as to whether there is in fact a primary topic, now would be a time for you to say so. Mackensen (talk) 20:02, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Clearly not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.[1]--Cúchullain ^t/c 20:13, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support the proposal, as no article stands out as being overly more notable or deserving of the PT than another. DAB the best outcome. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:31, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.